Risks include eutrophication due to nutrient loads from fish feces, feed losses
Most of the large rivers in Brazil’s upper Paraná River basin, which drains the most industrialized and populated portion of South America, have been transformed into cascades of hydroelectric reservoirs during the past 50 years. This caused losses of aquatic biodiversity and interruption of migratory fish routes that resulted in low fishery production. Several attempts at stock enhancement were carried out, although these artificial ecosystems have persisted as relative biological deserts. On the other hand, the impoundments have enhanced the water quality of the resulting lakes.
No solution for food production in these large ecosystems emerged until cage aquaculture was shown to be feasible. In spite of great biodiversity in local freshwaters, no competitive, native option has yet emerged, and cage aquaculture has been mainly based on tilapia farming.
Farming potential
The total area of reservoirs in the upper Paraná basin is over 500,000 ha and has a potential for annual fish production of more than 2 million metric tons (MT) by using only 0.5 percent of the area.
Cage aquaculture in hydroelectric reservoirs has great potential for expansion in Brazil, but there are concerns of negative environmental impacts, particularly the risks of eutrophication due to nutrient loads derived from fish feces and feed losses. Continuous impacts from agriculture runoff and urban sewage are critical issues for many southern Brazilian rivers, and any new source of nutrient loads would be problematic. However, properly planned and located aquaculture could enhance fishery production in reservoirs.
The preservation of strategic public water resources requires government planning to set limits on any activity with the potential for causing eutrophication. Government and private stakeholders agree on the risks of pollution from cage aquaculture, and regulations limited the cage facilities in hydroelectric reservoirs to 1 percent of the area of each site, but no objective evaluations proved this limit suitable.
Harmonization required
The environmental sustainability of cage aquaculture depends on harmonization between farming practices and the hydrological peculiarities of the proposed site. Natural resources must be used without causing drastic, deleterious changes in the structure and function of the ecosystems in which cages are sited.
The main risks are associated with eutrophication processes. In freshwater reservoirs, phosphorus emission is a key factor. To quantify the amount of fish that can be produced at each site, engineers must determine how much phosphorus is loaded per ton of fish produced to establish the carrying capacity of the site – the amount of phosphorus that can be loaded in a given period without surpassing the threshold of eutrophication. The phosphorus load can be calculated by considering feed conversion ratios and the phosphorus content of feed, while carrying capacity is much more complicated to assess.
Carrying capacity
Carrying capacity is determined by the intrinsic limnological characteristics of each site. Its estimation demands field surveys that examine detailed bathymetry, hydrodynamics, water conductivity, profiles of dissolved oxygen and temperature, turbidity, chlorophyll α and other factors.
The main factors considered in determining the carrying capacity of a given site are:
• Mean depth. Deeper depths allow more intensive production.
• Flushing rate is calculated as the theoretical time needed to fully exchange the water volume of a site. Low flushing times allow more intensive production.
• Initial water nutrient content. Cleaner water with less nutrients can handle a higher aquaculture load.
• Sedimentation rate. More intense sedimentation keeps water clean, allowing more intensive production.
These assessments are made using mass balance models to estimate the amounts of nutrients that can be loaded without triggering eutrophication. If the nutrient load related to the production of a ton of fish is known, the maximum allowable production at a given site can be calculated.
Load modeling
For instance, in Table 1, the simulated carrying capacities for tilapia cage culture in two sites with similar 31-square-kilometer areas but different water retention times and mean depths were very different – 3,982 versus 7,768 MT/year in the Pantano River and Ponte Pensa River areas, respectively. This resulted even though the more productive site displayed a higher initial phosphorus level (12.7 versus 16.1 mg per cubic meter).
David, Simulated carrying capacity, Table 1
Site | Area (km2) | Mean Depth (m) | Volume (m3) | Flushing Rate (days) | Initial Total Phosphorus (mg/m3) | Phosphorus Limit (mg/m3) | Sedimentation Rate | Maximum Annual Phosphorus Load (mg/m2) | Annual Allowable Phosphorus Load (kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantano River | 31.61 | 6.0 | 189,660,000 | 33.01 | 12.7 | 30 | 0.335 | 1,700.82 | 53,762.91 |
Ponte Pensa River | 30.88 | 10.4 | 321,152,000 | 21.61 | 16.1 | 30 | 0.290 | 3,396.16 | 104,873.52 |
Model calculations assumed a standard phosphorus emission of 13.5 kg/mt of produced tilapia based on an average 1.5 feed-conversion ratio (FCR) and 1.5 percent total phosphorus feed content, although feeding management may drastically affect total allowable fish production.
Simulating a 20 percent FCR shift from 1.5 to 1.8, phosphorus emission would increase 25 percent, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in the compatible production according to site carrying capacity. Accordingly, a 6.7 percent change in phosphorus feed content from 1.5 to 1.6 percent would result in a 9 percent decrease in total allowable production at the farm site. Total production can be almost tenfold lower when low-quality feed and high FCR are associated (Fig. 1).
Some reservoir sites register significant nutrient increases related to cage farming, but not enough to reach the eutrophication threshold due to the limited scale of farming operations. Seasonal variations in hydrological features are also relevant, with reduction in the carrying capacity related to massive nutrient influx from agricultural and sewage runoff, especially in summer, when water temperatures are more favorable for tilapia farming.
Water temperatures during winter months are frequently below 20 degrees-C, when tilapia cultivation is less profitable due to reduced growth and potential increases in diseases and parasites. Under these conditions, the efficiency of nutrient use by fish may be lower, with potential higher nutrient emissions to the environment. Careful climate zoning for tilapia cultivation could assist proper planning of cage siting.
Environmental planning
In the last four years, carrying capacity studies have been carried out by the authors’ research group at 19 sites in the upper Paraná River basin with a concentration on the Ilha Solteira and Chavantes reservoirs. Fish production at most studied sites seemed compatible with local carrying capacities for assimilation and recycling of nutrients derived from farming. Water quality conditions were excellent, with no signals of surpassing eutrophication thresholds – probably due to the limited scale of the farming operations.
Specific models are needed for the further management of aquaculture in the ecosystems considered. Effective planning for farming public waters will require further discussion and guidance at various governmental levels to reach a truly sustainable aquaculture.
(Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in the January/February 2011 print edition of the Global Aquaculture Advocate.)
Authors
-
Gianmarco S. David
São Paulo State Agribusiness Technology Agency
Av. Pedro Ometto, 874-17430-000
Barra Bonita, Brazil[114,98,46,109,111,99,46,108,111,117,64,110,97,105,103,48,48,48,50]
-
Edmir D. Carvalho
Fish Biology and Ecology Laboratory
São Paulo State University
Botucatu, Brazil -
Igor Paiva Ramos
Fish Biology and Ecology Laboratory
São Paulo State University
Botucatu, Brazil -
Reinaldo J. Silva
Wild Fauna Parasitology Laboratory
São Paulo State University
Botucatu, Brazil -
Alexandre N. Silveira
Department of Biology and Animal Science
São Paulo State University
Ilha Solteira, Brazil -
Fanny Yasumaru
Department of Biology and Animal Science
São Paulo State University
Ilha Solteira, Brazil -
Caio C. Ribeiro
Department of Biology and Animal Science
São Paulo State University
Ilha Solteira, Brazil -
Daniel Lemos
LAM Aquaculture Laboratory
Oceanographic Institute
University of São Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil
Related Posts
Responsibility
A look at various intensive shrimp farming systems in Asia
The impact of diseases led some Asian shrimp farming countries to develop biofloc and recirculation aquaculture system (RAS) production technologies. Treating incoming water for culture operations and wastewater treatment are biosecurity measures for disease prevention and control.
Health & Welfare
Acclimating shrimp postlarvae before pond stocking
Shrimp postlarvae acclimation before stocking into the various growout systems (ponds, raceways, tanks) is a critical – and often overlooked, sometimes taken for granted – step in the shrimp culture process. Various water quality parameters should be changed slowly so that the young shrimp have the time to gradually adapt to the new conditions.
Responsibility
Appraising pond liners for shrimp culture
The use of plastic-lined ponds by shrimp farmers can significantly improve production efficiency, support more production cycles per year, and higher mechanical aeration rates and stocking densities. The capital cost of lining ponds can be very significant, so a thorough feasibility analysis is recommended when considering this production tool.
Innovation & Investment
Aquaculture planning, development in Brazilian federal waters
The aquaculture industry in Brazil is moving toward further expansion with the support of the federal government. A key strategy of the More Fishing and Aquaculture plan is the development of aquaculture in federal waters. The plan promotes sustainable development of fisheries and aquaculture by linking those involved and consolidating state policies addressing social inclusion, security and food sovereignty. Tilapia is the main farmed fish, although tambaqui and others have potential for large-scale production due to their wide acceptance by consumers.